Effect of Sleeper One® 5 anesthesia device on heart rate

Authors

Keywords:

Sleeper One® 5, Dental anxiety, Local anesthesia, Computer-controlled anesthesia, Dental pain

Abstract

Aim: This study compares the pulse parameter values before, during, and after anesthesia using computer-assisted local infiltration anesthesia and traditional local infiltration anesthesia methods in children.                                    

Materials and Methods: The study included 100 children aged 7-11 who applied to the pediatric dentistry clinic. During the initial session, the children underwent intraoral examinations. The children were divided into two groups randomly. Traditional local infiltration and computer-assisted local anesthesia were applied to treat dentin caries in the maxillary primary molar teeth. The heart rate of the patients was measured using a pulse oximeter device.

Results: The average age of the patients was 8.21±1.00 years, with 48 (48.0%) male and 52 (52.0%) female. The average heart rate (HR) was found to be 99.28±14.68. At the end of the study, 61 (61.0%) of the patients preferred the computer-assisted anesthesia method, and 39 (39.0%) preferred the traditional method. A notable distinction exists between the pre- and post-anaesthesia heart rate values associated with each anesthesia technique, indicating significant variations when comparing different methods of anesthesia (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two methodologies across all measured values (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in heart rate parameters, 61% of the patients preferred the computer-controlled local anesthesia method, which showed effectiveness in reducing anxiety. Further studies are required to confirm these results using modern local anesthesia devices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-26

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Effect of Sleeper One® 5 anesthesia device on heart rate. Ann Med Res [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 26 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];32(2):085-91. Available from: http://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/4810